[skaczmarek]

What ever happened to the Washington Post running tally of Trump lies during his first term in office? Did they rate the lies based on whether they were outright falsehoods, (not the truth), partial truths leaving out critical information (not the whole truth), or truths buried in inuendo and other falsehoods that warp our understanding of that truth (not nothing but the whole truth)? Can such a system be applied to every newscast? Might that be enough to convince those addicted to prejudicial and tainted news sources, that they are being misled?

Topic